Skip to content
AI Policy Generator

Registers, datasheets and records · Technical file · Tools and instruments

General-Purpose AI Model Documentation

Reference structure for the technical documentation, downstream-provider information, copyright policy and public training-data summary under AI Act arts. 53-55.

GROU LLC · built on AI Business Core, by Vreinn · · How we verify sources

Who it helps

Developers of general-purpose AI models offered in the EU.

Who uses it
AI Office, downstream providers and the public
Usual owner
Research; legal
Formats
DOCX, PDF
Languages
Español, English
Approximate length
12 pages
Length
Extended. An assessment or file with several parts, annexes and records.
Document type
Registers, datasheets and records. Tables and forms to keep track of what exists and what was decided.
Document code
APG-TLS-009. APG is the AI Policy Generator collection, TLS the area (Tools and instruments) and the number identifies the document. Use it to cite the document in your document system.

Preview

Excerpt generated from the document: the "How to use this document" section, the title and the first two sections, plus the full table of contents. The rest of the text is not shown.

APG-TLS-009 · Version 1.1.0 · sources as of November 2, 2026

How to use this document

  • What it is for. It provides a reference structure for the provider of a general-purpose AI model to organize the documentation under arts. 53 to 55 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the "AI Act"): the model's technical documentation (Annex XI), information for providers that integrate it into their systems (Annex XII), the copyright policy and preparation of the public summary of training content. It includes the additional obligations for models with systemic risk.
  • Public summary of training content. This document does not reproduce the AI Office's official template for that summary. Download and use the current version published by the Commission and its explanatory notice; Part D only helps you gather the internal information needed to complete it.
  • Who should own it. The model owner (research or model engineering), with legal (intellectual property and regulatory), data governance and security. Enter the function in [RESPONSIBLE FUNCTION] and the person in [OWNER].
  • Decisions to take first. Confirm with your advisor: whether the model is general-purpose and whether the organization is its provider or only modifies or integrates it (section 2); whether it can rely on the open-source exception (section 2.3); whether the model has systemic risk (section 2.4); and whether the organization signs up to the general-purpose AI code of practice.
  • Code of practice. If your organization signs up to the code of practice, check whether it provides its own forms (for example, for model documentation) and use them as the primary format; this structure can serve as an internal index and checklist.
  • Dates. The application dates, the transitional regime for models placed on the market before the obligations applied and the date from which the AI Office can impose fines are shown in "Related regulatory references." Confirm them with your advisor.
  • Fields to complete. Replace [AI SYSTEM] with the model name, [LEGAL ENTITY NAME], [OWNER], [AI GOVERNANCE EMAIL] and the [COMPLETE] fields. Refer to long documents by code and version instead of copying them.
  • Review and approval. Have your legal counsel review sections 2, 5 and 6 in particular. Approve each version and record it in "Version history."

General-Purpose AI Model Documentation

1. Control data

Field Value
Model [AI SYSTEM]
Version or variants covered [COMPLETE]
Provider [LEGAL ENTITY NAME]; [COMPLETE: address and contact]
EU authorized representative (if the provider is not established in the EU) [COMPLETE]
EU release date [DATE]
Distribution methods [COMPLETE: API, weights download, integration into own products, other]
License [COMPLETE]
Model with systemic risk? [COMPLETE: yes, no, under analysis]
Signed up to the code of practice? [COMPLETE]
Documentation owner [OWNER]
Contact for integrators and authorities [AI GOVERNANCE EMAIL]
File version and date [COMPLETE]; [DATE]

2. Scope and classification

2.1 Is it a general-purpose AI model?

Question Answer Evidence
Does the model display significant generality and competently perform a wide range of distinct tasks? [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]
Can it be integrated into a variety of downstream systems or applications? [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]
Is it used only for research, development or prototyping before being placed on the market? [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]
Indicative criteria from the Commission guidelines applied [COMPLETE: confirm with your advisor the current criteria] [COMPLETE]
Conclusion [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]

2.2 The organization's role

Question Answer
Does it develop the model, or have it developed, and place it on the market under its name or trademark? [COMPLETE]
Does it modify (for example, through fine-tuning) a third party's model? To what extent? [COMPLETE: confirm with your advisor whether the modification makes it the provider of the modified model and for which obligations]
Does it only integrate a third party's model into its own system? (if so, the obligations in this document fall on the model provider, and the organization needs the Part B information) [COMPLETE]
Resulting role [COMPLETE]

2.3 Open-source exception

The technical documentation (Part A) and integrator information (Part B) obligations do not apply to models released under a free and open-source license that allows access, use, modification and distribution, where their parameters (including weights), information on their architecture and on their use are publicly available. The exception does not apply to models with systemic risk and does not exempt from the copyright policy (Part C) or the public summary (Part D).

Condition Met? Evidence
Free and open-source license allowing access, use, modification and distribution [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]
Parameters, including weights, public [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]
Architecture information public [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]
Model usage information public [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]
The model does not have systemic risk [COMPLETE] [COMPLETE]

2.4 Systemic risk

2.4.1. A model is presumed to have high-impact capabilities when the cumulative amount of computation used for its training, measured in floating-point operations, is greater than 10^25. The Commission may amend this threshold and may also designate models based on other criteria (arts. 51 and 52).

2.4.2. Estimated cumulative training compute: [COMPLETE], using the estimation method: [COMPLETE].

2.4.3. If the threshold is met, or it becomes known that it will be met, [ORGANIZATION NAME] notifies the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks, with the information showing this. With the notification it may present sufficiently substantiated arguments that, exceptionally, the model does not present systemic risks. Notification date: [DATE]. Owner: [OWNER].

Full table of contents of the document:

  • 1. Control data
  • 2. Scope and classification
  • 3. Part A. Model technical documentation (Annex XI)
  • 4. Part B. Information for providers integrating the model (Annex XII)
  • 5. Part C. Copyright policy
  • 6. Part D. Public summary of training content
  • 7. Part E. Additional obligations for models with systemic risk (art. 55)
  • 8. Part F. Authorized representative
  • 9. Part G. Retention, updates and cooperation
  • Country variants
  • Implementation aids
  • Related regulatory references
  • Version history

Rules in the registry whose obligations relate to this base document, based on our reading of the sources. It does not mean they apply to you.

European Union

Kits that include this document

Includes 91 documents

Complete pack

Every sellable template in the catalog in a single pack: base policies, procedures, registers, notices and matrices to adapt with your own team, at a flat price below the sum of the individual documents.

USD 297USD 3393

Complete kit · available to buy

What AI Policy Generator is and how it works