Policy to manage model risk, including AI models, in financial institutions: inventory with materiality tiers, independent validation, monitoring and accountable owners.
Banks, fintechs, credit unions and insurers using scoring, fraud, pricing or reserving models.
Who uses it
Risk, model validation, audit, data science and board
Usual owner
Risk management; data science
Formats
DOCX, PDF
Languages
Español, English
Approximate length
12 pages
Length
Extended. An assessment or file with several parts, annexes and records.
Document type
Policies and internal rules. Rules your organization approves and staff follow: what is allowed, what is not and who decides.
Document code
APG-RSK-009. APG is the AI Policy Generator collection, RSK the area (Risk) and the number identifies the document. Use it to cite the document in your document system.
Preview
Excerpt generated from the document: the "How to use this document" section, the title and the first two sections, plus the full table of contents. The rest of the text is not shown.
APG-RSK-009 · Version 1.1.0 · sources as of November 4, 2026
How to use this document
Use it to set out how the organization identifies, classifies, validates, approves, monitors and retires the models it uses, including AI and machine learning models and vendor models. It includes the model inventory format and the materiality worksheet.
Give it a clear owner: usually the risk function (second line), with data science and business units as owners of each model and internal audit as the third line.
Before adopting it, the organization should decide which body approves the policy (board or delegated committee), whether it creates a dedicated model risk committee or assigns these duties to the risk committee, who performs independent validation (internal team or third party) and which criteria and thresholds it uses for materiality tiers.
Complete the [COMPLETE] fields in sections 5 (materiality thresholds), 8 (validation frequencies) and 10 (monitoring thresholds) with values consistent with the institution's size and risk profile.
Keep only the country variants for the supervisors that apply to the institution (Peru, Ecuador, European Union or United States) and delete the rest. Several may apply at once in regional groups.
Fields marked [COMPLETE] include points to confirm with your advisor, especially minimum frequencies, notification deadlines to the supervisor and the scope of the rules for generative AI models.
Before approval, have it reviewed by the risk function, regulatory compliance, in-house legal or an external advisor and, if it exists, the model validation function.
Approve it at the board or equivalent body, communicate it to the teams that develop or use models and publish the inventory in a repository with access and version control.
Model Risk Management Policy and Model Inventory
Field
Content
Institution
[LEGAL ENTITY NAME] ([ORGANIZATION NAME])
Primary supervisor
[COMPLETE]
Policy owner
[RESPONSIBLE FUNCTION]
Head of model risk management
[OWNER]
Approving body
[APPROVED BY]
Approval date
[DATE]
Review frequency
[REVIEW FREQUENCY]
Contact
[AI GOVERNANCE EMAIL]
1. Purpose
1.1 This policy sets out how [ORGANIZATION NAME] manages model risk: the possibility of losses, harm to customers, penalties or reputational damage from decisions based on models with design, data or implementation errors, or from misuse of sound models.
1.2 Its purpose is that every model is inventoried, has an owner, is classified by materiality, is independently validated with a depth proportional to its risk, is monitored and is retired in an orderly way.
2. Scope and definition of model
2.1 For this policy, a model is a quantitative, statistical, mathematical, machine learning or artificial intelligence method that processes input data and produces estimates, scores, classifications, predictions, recommendations or content used to make decisions or to inform management or the supervisor.
2.2 It includes, among others:
origination, credit scoring and behavioral models;
expected loss, provisioning and capital models;
pricing, ratemaking and technical reserve models;
fraud detection and anti-money laundering models;
market, liquidity and operational risk models;
AI and machine learning models used in customer service, collections, marketing or workforce management when they influence relevant decisions;
models developed by third parties, including those embedded in vendor products, and generative AI services used for tasks that affect customers or decisions.
2.3 End-user computing tools (for example, complex spreadsheets) are included when they meet the definition in 2.1 and their output is used in relevant decisions.
2.4 AI systems that do not meet the definition of model, such as productivity assistants with no effect on decisions, are governed by the "Responsible AI Use Policy (Including Generative AI)" and recorded in the "AI System Inventory". [RESPONSIBLE FUNCTION] resolves borderline cases and records the decision in the inventory.
Full table of contents of the document:
1. Purpose
2. Scope and definition of model
3. Principles
4. Governance and roles
5. Model risk level (materiality)
6. Model inventory
7. Development and documentation
8. Independent validation
9. Approval and deployment
10. Ongoing monitoring
11. Change management
12. Third-party models
13. Decisions on customers and people
14. Model incidents
15. Exceptions and temporary use
16. Model retirement
17. Reporting
18. Non-compliance
Country variants
Implementation aids
Related regulatory references
Version history
Related rules
Rules in the registry whose obligations relate to this base document, based on our reading of the sources. It does not mean they apply to you.
Test credit models for discrimination15 U.S.C. § 1691(a); 12 CFR 1002.4Regulator guidance(supporting)Pending confirmation in the official source (last checked: November 4, 2026)
Model risk with inventory and materiality, adverse-decision explanation letters, human review, a decision log, technical model documentation and the EU AI Act Art. 26 checklist for high-risk systems.
Every sellable template in the catalog in a single pack: base policies, procedures, registers, notices and matrices to adapt with your own team, at a flat price below the sum of the individual documents.