Admissions, grading or exam proctoring in Argentina: related rules
AI that decides admissions, grades work, assigns levels or proctors online exams. It shapes students' access to education, often minors, so it is high-risk in the EU and Peru, and emotion recognition in classrooms is banned in the EU.
Risk classification
Obligations related to this use case
Behavior assessments not based solely on automated profiles
If you are a public body or supply systems that support administrative acts assessing people's behavior.
What the rule provides
Do not base court decisions or administrative acts that assess human behavior solely on a profile produced by automated processing; such acts are void.
Verified in the official source on November 2, 2026Articles checked in the consolidated InfoLEG text (Law 25,326). The AAIP Res. 126/2024 regime (Official Bulletin May 24, 2024, in force June 1, 2024) was taken from secondary sources (Beccar Varela, Marval, Bruchou).
Explain the logic of automated decisions
AAIP Res. 4/2019Res. AAIP 4/2019, criterio sobre decisiones automatizadas (Ley 25.326, art. 15 inc. 1)In force
Already applicable
When it relates
If you use systems that make solely automated decisions about people (credit, employment, insurance, access to services).
What the rule provides
When someone requests access, explain the logic used in the automated decision that negatively affected them.
Record variables and model version so each decision can be explained.
Verified in the official source on November 4, 2026Checked in InfoLEG: AAIP Res. 4/2019, Annex I, criterion 2 ("explanation of the logic applied"); its art. 1 makes it mandatory. Logging variables and model version is a suggested practice to be able to give that explanation.
Chatbot protocol for minors and crises, DPIA, AI notices, human oversight in assessment and a check for prohibited practices such as emotion recognition.