AI agents that take actions in United States (federal): related rules
Systems that, given a goal, plan and execute actions in other tools: sending emails, purchasing, changing records or approving requests. Their risk depends on the permissions they hold and whether they decide about people without human involvement.
Pending confirmation in the official source (last checked: November 4, 2026)le.utah.gov refused the connection on Nov 4, 2026, so the official text is still unchecked. The wording after SB 226 still has to be confirmed in Utah Code § 13-75-103, and § 63I-2-213 has to show whether the Jul 1, 2027 repeal also covers what SB 226 added. Content per FPF and Perkins Coie.
Pending confirmation in the official source (last checked: November 4, 2026)le.utah.gov refused the connection on Nov 4, 2026, so the official text is still unchecked. The wording after SB 226 still has to be confirmed in Utah Code § 13-75-103, and § 63I-2-213 has to show whether the Jul 1, 2027 repeal also covers what SB 226 added. Content per FPF and Perkins Coie.
Six base documents for agents that act in systems: autonomy and permissions policy, integration map, adversarial testing, human oversight, rollback and incident response.