Access to public services or benefits in Argentina: related rules
AI used by public bodies or their suppliers to decide or prioritize access to subsidies, aid, social or health services, or permits. It affects vulnerable people and fundamental rights, so it requires impact assessment, transparency and human review.
Risk classification
Obligations related to this use case
Behavior assessments not based solely on automated profiles
If you are a public body or supply systems that support administrative acts assessing people's behavior.
What the rule provides
Do not base court decisions or administrative acts that assess human behavior solely on a profile produced by automated processing; such acts are void.
Verified in the official source on November 2, 2026Articles checked in the consolidated InfoLEG text (Law 25,326). The AAIP Res. 126/2024 regime (Official Bulletin May 24, 2024, in force June 1, 2024) was taken from secondary sources (Beccar Varela, Marval, Bruchou).
Explain the logic of automated decisions
AAIP Res. 4/2019Res. AAIP 4/2019, criterio sobre decisiones automatizadas (Ley 25.326, art. 15 inc. 1)In force
Already applicable
When it relates
If you use systems that make solely automated decisions about people (credit, employment, insurance, access to services).
What the rule provides
When someone requests access, explain the logic used in the automated decision that negatively affected them.
Record variables and model version so each decision can be explained.
Verified in the official source on November 4, 2026Checked in InfoLEG: AAIP Res. 4/2019, Annex I, criterion 2 ("explanation of the logic applied"); its art. 1 makes it mandatory. Logging variables and model version is a suggested practice to be able to give that explanation.
Base documents for public bodies and their suppliers: AI lead, governance model, inventory, algorithmic and fundamental rights impact assessments, human oversight and explanation to citizens.